This is the fifth article in a seven part series of our commentary on the GFOA recommended practices for Capital Project Monitoring and Reporting. We have found that the structure of Capital Budgets and Capital Improvement Plans are highly evolved and visible for many jurisdictions. However project status is less structured and less standardized
Report on Project Status and Activities.
Producing project status reports will help officials make informed decisions regarding scheduling and cost. (In establishing report content and frequency it is important for officials to keep in mind that high profile projects often require more extensive reporting of activity compared to a jurisdiction’s more routine capital projects.) It is important to be consistent and use plain language when compiling information from various sources and reporting it to multiple stakeholders. Meaningful reports should provide straightforward project information for executive leadership and internal staff as well as citizens and the media, and, at minimum:
Our commentary on this section will focus on three areas of interest: